Solis et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
| VICTORIO Solis and ALEYDA Solis |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. |
| 1:2007cv00205 |
| November 30, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Brownsville Office |
| Cameron |
| John William Black |
| Andrew S. Hanen |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER AND OPINION granting 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment. To survive a motion for summary judgment in a Texas premises liability case, a plaintiff must provide evidence raising a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the Defendant had actua l or constructive knowledge of a dangerous condition which allegedly caused that plaintiff's injuries. Because the Plaintiffs in this case have not provided sufficient evidence to raise that genuine issue, the Court grants the Defendant's motion for summary judgment.(Signed by Judge Andrew S. Hanen) Parties notified.(bcampos, )
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 6 Motion to Remand; denying 9 Motion for Leave to File; Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition (Docket No. 9) to add Mr. Orozco as a party is hereby DENIED. As this Court has diversity jurisdiction over the remaining action between the Plaintiffs and Defendant Wal-Mart, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Docket No. 6) is hereby DENIED.(Signed by Judge Andrew S. Hanen) Parties notified.(bcampos, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
