Flores v. Nueces County, Texas et al
Michael Flores, Jr. |
Nueces County, Texas and Christus Spohn Nueces County, Texas |
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel |
2:2009cv00080 |
April 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Corpus Christi Office |
Nueces |
Hayden Head |
B. Janice Ellington |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, denying as moot 73 MOTION for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(lcayce, ) |
Filing 74 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING NUECES COUNTY'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER granting 59 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 69 Motion for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(bcortez, ) |
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice 54 MOTION for transcript at public expense.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(srussell, ) |
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice 40 THIRD MOTION for Appointment of Counsel.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(srussell, ) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL denying 24 Motion to Appoint.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(mserpa, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.