Garcia v. Hackman et al
Basillo Garcia |
Richard Crites and James Hackman |
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel |
2:2010cv00311 |
September 23, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Corpus Christi Office |
Bee |
Janis Graham Jack |
Brian L Owsley |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 ORDER denying Plaintiff's Motion for Transcripts re 93 .(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(amireles, ) |
Filing 92 OPINION AND ORDER denying 89 Motion to Alter or Amend Final Judgment.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(lsmith, ) |
Filing 87 OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPT 86 Motion.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(brngarcia, ) |
Filing 62 OPINION DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(amireles, ) |
Filing 61 OPINION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE 45 -5.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(amireles, ) |
Filing 31 ORDER denying 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 20 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Amend (Converted into Motion to supplement consistent with this Order).(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(lsmith, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.