Vasquez v. Nueces County et al
Maria Angela Vasquez |
Ramiro Canales and Nueces County, Texas |
2:2011cv00045 |
February 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Corpus Christi Office |
Nueces |
John D. Rainey |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 623 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant Nueces County's 75 Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted, and this action is Dismissed. (Signed by Judge John D. Rainey.) Parties notified. (yhausmann, ) |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants' 24 Motion to Strike 23 Plaintiff's First Amended Original Complaint is Granted. Docket No. 23 is ordred Stricken, and the Clerk is directed to file Docket No. [17-1] as Plaintiff's First Amended Original Complaint; Defendants' 25 Second Rule 12(e) Motion for More Definite Statement is Denied; Defendants' 26 Second Motion to Dismiss Ramiro Canales in his Official Capacity is Granted; Defendants' 27 Second Rule 12( b)(1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction is Denied; and Defendants' 28 Second Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is Granted in part and Denied in part. Plaintiff's claims for racial discrimination under Title VII and the TCHRA; retaliation and hostile work environment under Title VII, the TCHRA, and the ADEA; and violations of 42 USC 1981 and 1983 are hereby Dismissed. (Signed by Judge John D. Rainey.) Parties notified. (yhausmann, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.