Meritain Health Inc:
Appellant: Meritain Health Inc
Case Number: 2:2011cv00225
Filed: July 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Corpus Christi Office
County: Nueces
Presiding Judge: Andrew S. Hanen
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER. Based upon the foregoing discussion, the decision of the Bankruptcy Court is affirmed. The order is affirmed with respect to its finding that the August 31, 2009 termination of the Agreement was not nullified by the co ntinued performance of the parties. In this regard, its findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and this Court finds its legal conclusions to be accurate. Since it finds that ASARCO'S notice of termination was rightfully exercised and was not subsequently nullified, the Court need not reach the other grounds relied upon by the Bankruptcy Court. (Signed by Judge Andrew S. Hanen) Parties notified.(bcampos, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meritain Health Inc:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Meritain Health Inc
Represented By: Daniel A Platt
Represented By: Clinton Ross Snow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?