Clay v. Ambriz
Thomas H Clay |
Garcia, Valdez, A. Ambriz, J. Miles, Norris Jackson, Asst. Warden, Buttery, TDCJ-ID Employees, Barrientes, A. Hernandez and Daughtry |
2:2012cv00053 |
February 13, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Corpus Christi Office |
Walker |
Brian L Owsley |
Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION AND TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL re: 28 MOTION for Leave to Appeal as to 19 Final Judgment, 33 Memorandum and Recommendations, 30 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(amireles, ) |
Filing 25 OPINION denying 23 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(lsmith, ) |
Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re: 10 Memorandum and Recommendations, 8 Memorandum and Recommendations, 6 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, 9 MOTION/AP PLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, 5 MOTION Rule 24 Motion of Request to Proceed IFP. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may move to reinstate the lawsuit, but only if the $350.00 filing fee is paid simultaneously with the motion to reinstate within thirty days of the date of dismissal. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.