Sand Storage, LLC v. Trican Well Service, L.P. et al
Plaintiff: Sand Storage, LLC
Defendant: Trican Well Service, L.P. and Trilib Management, LLC
Case Number: 2:2013cv00303
Filed: September 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Corpus Christi Office
County: Nueces
Presiding Judge: Nelva Gonzales Ramos
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 314 ORDER. The Court ORDERS Sand Storage to file a supplemental brief addressing whether Sand Storage is entitled to attorneys fees under the contract or by statute based on the facts of this case. Such brief is due on or before August 5, 2015. Trican may file a response to Sand Storages supplemental brief on or before August 12, 2015. No further briefing will be allowed unless further ordered by the Court. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 208 MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSED MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN DEFENDANT'S PRIVILEGE LOG granting in part and denying in part 193 Motion for Discovery.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
April 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 190 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS' IN-HOUSE COUNSEL FORREST GORDON granting in part 180 Motion for Discovery. The deposition shall be taken on or before April 17, 2015.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
December 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 148 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting in part 90 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Related Dispositve Motions, dismissing without prejudice 89 MOTION to Dismiss Tort Claims without Prejudice, granting in part 91 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 137 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE PARTIES' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS re 90 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Related Dispositve Motions, 89 MOTION to Dismiss Tort Claims without Prejudice, 91 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Objections to M&R due by 11/10/2014(Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sand Storage, LLC v. Trican Well Service, L.P. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sand Storage, LLC
Represented By: Shelby A Jordan
Represented By: Jose Antonio Ortiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trican Well Service, L.P.
Represented By: Lee Alan Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trilib Management, LLC
Represented By: Lee Alan Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?