Rogers v TDC et al Per #119, Rogers is not to file any declarations etc unless instructed by the Court, or any motion without express authorization from the Court. All documents filed w/o authorization will be STRICKEN.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Southern District Rogers v TDC et al Per #119, Rogers is not to file any declarations etc unless instructed by the Court, or any motion without express authorization from the Court. All documents filed w/o authorization will be STRICKEN.

Plaintiff:	Carleton W Rogers
Defendant:	R J Gilbert
Case Number:	3:2007cv00330
Filed:	March 2, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office:	Galveston Office
Presiding Judge:	Melinda Harmon
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 2, 2010	Filing 161 OPINION ON DISMISSAL granting 149 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 151 Motion for Discovery; denying 153 Motion; denying 154 Motion to Amend; denying 156 Motion; dismissing 157 Motion; striking 159 Motion; denying 160 Motion to Strike.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(htippen, )
November 3, 2008	Filing 119 OPINION ON PARTIAL DISMISSAL Plaintiff's claims against all defendants, except Lt. Gilbert are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS LEGALLY FRIVOLOUS. All claims against Lt. Gilbert are RETAINED. Pltf's requests for compensatory and equitable reli ef against all defendants except Lt. Gilbert are DENIED. All pending motions are DENIED. Plaintiff is further ORDERED not to file any motion without express authorization form the Court. Plaintiff is cautioned that all documents and pleadings file d without express authorization from the Court will be STRICKEN. Terminating: 99 MOTION for Jury Trial, 100 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, 93 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 75 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 79 MOTION for Discovery, 111 MOTION Undeterminable, 91 MOTION To Testify, 116 MOTION MOTION For Case I.D. and 3rd Request of Court for DNA Hair Follicle Drug Test, 89 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 108 MOTION for Jury Trial MOTION Safty Move due to Illne ss and Threats, 98 MOTION for Discovery, 94 MOTION To Set, Confirm and Add Witness, 117 MOTION for Discovery MOTION For Case Numbers to be Assigned, 86 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 88 MOTION for Discovery MOTION to Testify, 92 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 84 MOTION for Discovery MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 77 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 105 MOTION for Discovery, 82 MOTION for Discovery, 90 MOTION for Reconsideration of 76 Order, 115 MOTION for Hair Falical Dru g DNA Test, Motion move off Darrington Unit, and Motion to Overturn Drug Case, 96 MOTION for Discovery, 85 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 87 MOTION to Consolidate Lead Case No. 3:07cv330 and Member Case No. 3:07cv511, 113 MOTION for DNA Drug, Motion for Evidence on Disruptive paper filing, and Motion for case numbers, 103 MOTION Motion to Testify, 109 MOTION for Discovery, 112 MOTION Motion for Case Number Assignment (4th Request), 97 MOTION to Discover Parole Violation, 104 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 102 MOTION To Move for Medical Safety.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(htippen, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 2, 2010

Filing 161 OPINION ON DISMISSAL granting 149 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 151 Motion for Discovery; denying 153 Motion; denying 154 Motion to Amend; denying 156 Motion; dismissing 157 Motion; striking 159 Motion; denying 160 Motion to Strike.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(htippen, )

November 3, 2008

Filing 119 OPINION ON PARTIAL DISMISSAL Plaintiff's claims against all defendants, except Lt. Gilbert are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS LEGALLY FRIVOLOUS. All claims against Lt. Gilbert are RETAINED. Pltf's requests for compensatory and equitable reli ef against all defendants except Lt. Gilbert are DENIED. All pending motions are DENIED. Plaintiff is further ORDERED not to file any motion without express authorization form the Court. Plaintiff is cautioned that all documents and pleadings file d without express authorization from the Court will be STRICKEN. Terminating: 99 MOTION for Jury Trial, 100 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, 93 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 75 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 79 MOTION for Discovery, 111 MOTION Undeterminable, 91 MOTION To Testify, 116 MOTION MOTION For Case I.D. and 3rd Request of Court for DNA Hair Follicle Drug Test, 89 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 108 MOTION for Jury Trial MOTION Safty Move due to Illne ss and Threats, 98 MOTION for Discovery, 94 MOTION To Set, Confirm and Add Witness, 117 MOTION for Discovery MOTION For Case Numbers to be Assigned, 86 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 88 MOTION for Discovery MOTION to Testify, 92 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 84 MOTION for Discovery MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 77 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 105 MOTION for Discovery, 82 MOTION for Discovery, 90 MOTION for Reconsideration of 76 Order, 115 MOTION for Hair Falical Dru g DNA Test, Motion move off Darrington Unit, and Motion to Overturn Drug Case, 96 MOTION for Discovery, 85 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 87 MOTION to Consolidate Lead Case No. 3:07cv330 and Member Case No. 3:07cv511, 113 MOTION for DNA Drug, Motion for Evidence on Disruptive paper filing, and Motion for case numbers, 103 MOTION Motion to Testify, 109 MOTION for Discovery, 112 MOTION Motion for Case Number Assignment (4th Request), 97 MOTION to Discover Parole Violation, 104 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint, 102 MOTION To Move for Medical Safety.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(htippen, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v TDC et al Per #119, Rogers is not to file any declarations etc unless instructed by the Court, or any motion without express authorization from the Court. All documents filed w/o authorization will be STRICKEN.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carleton W Rogers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: R J Gilbert
Represented By:	Nadine Phillpotts
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?