Haskett v. Capital Land Services, Inc. et al
| Phillip David Haskett |
| Capital Land Services, Inc., Jason Walker, Matt Tipton, Unknown Employees of CLS Group #1 - #9 and Unknown Clients of CLS Group #1 - #9 |
| 3:2014cv00279 |
| August 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Galveston Office |
| Galveston |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER; Plaintiff's response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/20/2017.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. Copy mailed to plaintiff via reg. mail.(dperez, 3)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER OF CLARIFICATION entered: The court held a discovery hearing on March 20, 2015. At the hearing, the court denied Phillip David Haskett's motions to extend discovery and to extend the time for filing a response to the defendants summary ju dgment motion. (Docket Entry Nos. 20, 25). The court directed Haskett to file a response to the defendants motion by April 10, 2015, that addresses the defendants arguments on (1) limitations and (2) his claim for breach of the settlement agreement. The court issues this order to clarify that Haskett's response should also address the defendants arguments on (3) his tortious-interference claim. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
