Ethridge v. Samsung SDI Co. Ltd et al
| James Ethridge |
| SAMSUNG SDI CO. LTD, AMAZON. COM, INC., Amazon.com Services, Inc., MACROMALL LLC, Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Amazon.com, Inc., Macromall, LLC and Firehouse Vapors, LLC |
| 3:2021cv00306 |
| October 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey V Brown |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 12(b)(2) by Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., filed. Motion Docket Date 1/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kutch, Raymond)
|
|
Filing 12
RESPONSE in Opposition to #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, filed by James Ethridge. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Ms. Nehmens In Support of Plaintiff's Opposition, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Exhibit Q)(Nehmens, Angela)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Stipulation of Dismissal (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 4)
|
|
Filing 10
STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by James Ethridge, filed.(Eiland, A.)
|
|
Filing 9
Unopposed MOTION FOR RULING ON PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Amazon.com Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 12/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Harrison, Clifford)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction by Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., filed. Motion Docket Date 12/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Kutch, Raymond)
|
|
Filing 7
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by James Ethridge, filed.(Nehmens, Angela)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Angela J. Nehmens to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Angela J. Nehmens to Appear Pro Hac Vice by James Ethridge, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Nehmens, Angela)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Amazon.com Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., filed.(Harrison, Clifford)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Amazon.com Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., filed.(Harrison, Clifford)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/23/2022 at 09:00 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison(Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(agould, 3)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 405th Judicial District Court of Galveston County, Texas, case number 21-CV-0426 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27267829) filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc., AMAZON. COM, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Harrison, Clifford)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
