Michael v. Kapipa
| Bruce Robert Michael |
| Nazim Kapipa, Phil Taylor, City of Columbus, TX, City Of Houston, Cellar Door Productions, Inc., Cellar Door Productions of Virginia, Inc., Concert Productions International and Clear Communications of Texas |
| 4:2007cv02912 |
| September 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Keith P Ellison |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
Memorandum & Order GRANTING 43 Motion to Dismiss the Claims against Them within 41 Amended Complaint Motion to Dismiss the Claims against Them within 41 Amended Complaint, GRANTING 56 Second Motion to Dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(6) 62 M otion to Amend 1 Complaint, & DENYING 64 Supplemental Motion to Supplement Motion to Add Additional Party as to 62 MOTION to Amend 1 Complaint 41 AmendeComplaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. All other pending motions are TERMINATED AS MOOT.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(csonnier, )
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, DENYING 9 MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint,GRANTING IN PART 7 MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint.( Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison ) Parties notified.(svaught)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
