AMALGAMATED BANK et al v. HEARTLAND PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
| Amalgamated Bank, Matadors Community Credit Union, GECU, MIDFLORIDA Federal Credit Union and Farmers State Bank |
| Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. |
| 4:2009cv02026 |
| June 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER entered: The Financial Institution plaintiffs stipulated to the dismissal of their claims under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, as set forth in Counts VIII and X of the Amended Complaint (Docket Entry No. 32), in the actio ns Amalgamated Bank et al. v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., Case No. 4:09-cv-02026, and PBC Credit Union et al. v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., Case No. 4:09-cv-02105. Based on the stipulated dismissal of the sole remaining claim, these cases are dismissed, with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
|
Filing
23
Final Judgment entered on all claims except the FUDTPA claim, as set forth in the Order Pursuant to FRCP 54(b). With this exception, all claims are dismissed with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
