Hobart v. City of Stafford et al
| Steve Hobart and Pam Hobart |
| City of Stafford, Jesus Estrada and Bonny Krahn |
| 4:2009cv03332 |
| October 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 109 MOTION for Reconsideration (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(sloewe, 4)
|
|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 94 MOTION for Summary Judgment Addressing Ratification Theory of Recovery (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(sloewe)
|
|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendant's Motion 32 for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(sloewe)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 7 MOTION to Dismiss.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(sloewe)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING 29 MOTION to Compel Deposition(s) of City Council MOTION to Compel Deposition(s) of City Council, TERMINATING 42 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(sloewe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
