Lucas v. Thaler
Petitioner: Alan Lucas
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Case Number: 4:2010cv00378
Filed: February 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Randall
Presiding Judge: Sim Lake
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. This Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus doc # 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED; Alan Lucuas, TDCJ is SANCTIONED in the amount of $500.00; Lucas is BARRED from filing any pleadings in this district.(Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(jegonzalez, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lucas v. Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alan Lucas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?