Doe v. Medlock et al
| John Doe |
| Brad Livingston, C Thomas O'Reilly, Patrick Medlock, FNU McVey and Michael Cunningham |
| 4:2010cv00573 |
| February 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Walker |
| Gray H. Miller |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART 76 Sealed motion, GRANTING 64 MOTION for Summary Judgment, GRANTING 59 Sealed motion. Plaintiffs claims for racial discrimination are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court will enter a separate revised scheduling order setting this case for trial. THIS IS AN INTERLOCUTORY ORDER. (Signed by Judge Gray H. Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 40 MOTION Rule 7(a) Reply, and GRANTING 48 MOTION for Protective Order.(Signed by Judge Gray H. Miller) Parties notified.(gseidl) (Main Document 50 replaced on 6/30/2010) (gseidl, ).
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 8 MOTION to Dismiss, as follows: (1) Plaintiff's claims against O'Reilly are RETAINED; (2) Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief against Livingston is DISMISSED; and (3) Plaintiff's request for declaratory relief against Livinston is RETAINED. This is an INTERLOCUTORY ORDER.(Signed by Judge Gray H. Miller) Parties notified.(gseidl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
