Pollard v. Thaler
Petitioner: Richard Dale Pollard
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Case Number: 4:2010cv01274
Filed: April 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Keith P Ellison
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 5 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support. Petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Case is dismissed without prejudice. Any and all pending motions are denied as moot. A certificate of appealability is denied.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(kstrouse, ) (Main Document 8 replaced on 8/13/2010) (kstrouse, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pollard v. Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Dale Pollard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Represented By: Charles Albert Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?