Herrera et al v. FAMSA, Inc. et al
Maura Herrera and Saul Cano |
FAMSA, Inc. and FAMSA International, LLC |
4:2010cv04457 |
November 9, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
Harris |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER OF DISMISSAL entered based on settlement notification. Case terminated on 12/13/11.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: The motion to extend the response deadline is granted. The plaintiffs must file a response to the summary-judgment motion by January 6, 2012. By December 16, 2011, the plaintiffs may depose Parilla and Barajas. By December 1, 2011, the plaintiffs may request the production of documents relevant to the plaintiffs eligibility for FMLA leave, the number of employees in FAMSAs Austin store, the distance of other FAMSA locations, whether Cano applied for FMLA leave, and any communications among FAMSA employees about Herrera and Cano. The motion for continuance, (Docket Entry No. 31), is granted to that extent and otherwise denied.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(chorace) |
Filing 26 ORDER entered: The parties may file a revised agreed protective order no later than June 24, 2011..(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.