Wade et al v. Best Buy
American Consultant, Legal Litigants, Paralegals, Professional Adjusters & Financial Brokers and Alex Melvin Wade, Jr. |
Best Buy |
4:2011cv04131 |
November 9, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
Jefferson |
Nancy F. Atlas |
Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENIED 47 MOTION for Hearing, 41 MOTION Filed Pursuant to Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, To Vacate, Recind & Or Modify Judgment of the Court Entered on May 11th, 2012 (Document 23 ), 43 MOTION Motion to Recuse Judge Nancy Atlas (Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, 4) |
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENIED 29 MOTION for Rehearing of Memorandum and Order of 27 Memorandum and Order (Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, ) |
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENIED 25 MOTION for Reconsideration of 24 Final Judgment MOTION for Rehearing of Final Judgement of 24 Final Judgment.(Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, ) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER.Defendant Best Buys Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 13] is GRANTED. It is furtherORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [Doc. # 21] is DENIED.The Court will issue a separate final judgment.(Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.