Latshaw Drilling Company, LLC v. SAIA Motor Freight Line, LLC

Plaintiff: Latshaw Drilling Company, LLC
Defendant: SAIA Motor Freight Line, LLC
Case Number: 4:2012cv01623
Filed: May 30, 2012
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: Lynn N. Hughes
Nature of Suit: Commercial/ICC Rates/etc.
Cause of Action: 49:81
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 8, 2013 15 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION on Partial Summary Judgment terminating 9 , 11 . Internal review set for 8/19/2013. (Signed by Judge Lynn N. Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Latshaw Drilling Company, LLC v. SAIA Motor Freight Line, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latshaw Drilling Company, LLC
Represented By: Gary L Murphree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAIA Motor Freight Line, LLC
Represented By: Ryan T Hand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.