Jones v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Rachelle H. Jones
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 4:2013cv00034
Filed: January 3, 2013
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M. Hoyt
Referring Judge: George C. Hanks
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 27, 2015 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 16 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The Defendant's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Case is DISMISSED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt) Parties notified. (wbostic, 4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachelle H. Jones
Represented By: Donald Clifton Dewberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.