Mwarabu v. Penncro Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff: Stephanie Mwarabu
Defendant: Penncro Associates, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2015cv00160
Filed: January 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Brazos
Presiding Judge: Melinda Harmon
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2104
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 42 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment , DENYING 34 MOTION for Summary Judgment . This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mwarabu v. Penncro Associates, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Mwarabu
Represented By: Carolyn Virginia Carollo
Represented By: Stuart J Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Penncro Associates, Inc.
Represented By: Susan L Bickley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?