Dewan, et al v. M-I, L.L.C.
Matthew Dewan |
M-I, L.L.C., Smith International Acquisition Corp. and Schlumberger Technology Corp |
Sarmad Syed and Ashley Balfour |
4:2015cv01746 |
June 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Alfred H. Bennett |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 OPINION AND ORDER. The motions to dismiss opt-in Plaintiff William J.Casey are DENIED and Casey may proceed as a full Plaintiff. ThusCourt ORDERS that M-Is motion for summary judgment 31 is DENIEDas to dismissal of Casey. The Court further ORDERS that Dewans motion for partial judgment on the pleadings as to certain affirmative defenses 51 for the reasons state above is DENIED. Finally the CourtORDERS that M-Is motion for summary judgment 31 on the grounds that Dewan and Casey are not en titled to overtime pay because they qualify as exempt employees under the administrative exemptions and that M-I did not misclassify them is GRANTED. Accordingly, this suit to recover unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201-219, shall bedismissed. Final judgment will issue by separate document. (Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(rhawkins) |
Filing 83 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 73 Motion to Transfer to the Southern District of Texas signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/18/2015. (Sant Agata, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.