Nesloney v. Midway Oilfield Constructors, Inc. et al
| Braxton Nesloney |
| Midway Oilfield Constructors, Inc. and Billy A. Smith |
| 4:2018cv00407 |
| February 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Madison |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER - Nelsoneys 26 motion for leave to file a motion to lift the stay and his 24 motion to lift the stay are granted. The defendants 23 motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Nelsoneys claims against Midway are dismissed. The claims against Smith may proceed....*** Midway Oilfield Constructors, Inc. terminated...*** Attorney Carmen Jo Rejda-Ponce and Larry J Simmons, Jr terminated. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER entered: The court stays the claims against the non-debtor defendant, Smith, until the bankruptcy court lifts the automatic state as to Midway. This case is administratively closed pending the lifting of the automatic stay against Midway. Either party may move to reinstate the case to the active docket within 14 days after the stay as to Midway is lifted. Case terminated on 10/22/18.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
