DM Arbor Court, Ltd. v. The City Of Houston
| DM Arbor Court, Ltd. |
| The City Of Houston |
| 4:2018cv01884 |
| June 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Gray H Miller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
315
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(arrivera, 4)
|
|
Filing
252
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTS the Citys Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on DMACs Equal Protection Claim (ECF No. 193);DENIES the Citys Motion to Strike DMACs Response to the Citys Motion to Exclude (ECF No. 224); DENIES the Citys Motion to Strike Mr. Marchitellis Errata Sheet (ECF No. 241); DENIES the Citys Motion to Exclude Mr. Marchitelli (ECF No. 200);DENIES the Citys Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on DMACs Takings Claim (ECF No. 199); and DENIES DMACs Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Takings Claim (ECF No. 202).(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(arrivera, 4)
|
|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 108 Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's third amended complaint. The motion is denied in part and granted in part as follows: 1. The motion to dismiss DMACs declaratory claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1)is DE NIED; 2.The motion to dismiss DMACs declaratory judgment claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED. 3.The motion to dismiss DMACs takings claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is DENIED as to DMACs categorical and non-categorical takings claims and GRAN TED as to DMACs inverse condemnation claim;4. The motion to dismiss DMACs substantive due process claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED; 5. The motion to dismiss DMACs procedural due process claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED; 6. The m otion to dismiss DMACs equal protection claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is DENIED; 7. The motion to dismiss DMACs Contract Clause claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED; 8. The motion to dismiss DMACs tortious interference claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) is DENIED; and 9. The motion to dismiss DMACs tortious interference claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4)
|
|
Filing
89
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Arbor Court's motion to amend (Dkt. 61) is DENIED; the City's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 26) is GRANTED. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER DENYING 82 MOTION to Amend 80 Final Judgment, GRANTING 81 Opposed MOTION to Correct 79 Memorandum and Order.(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
|
Filing
80
AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the courts 79 order signed November 13, 2019, Arbor Courts 61 motion to amend is DENIED, and the Citys 26 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
|
Filing
70
FINAL JUDGMENT. Pursuant to the courts 69 order signed September 18, 2019, Arbor Courts 61 motion to amend is DENIED, and the Citys 26 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE....*** Case terminated on 9/18/19. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DM Arbor Court, Ltd. v. The City Of Houston | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DM Arbor Court, Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth B. Chaiken |
| Represented By: | Robert L Chaiken |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The City Of Houston | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
