Parker v. Davis
| Steve Vic Parker |
| Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis |
| 4:2018cv02160 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Lancaster on behalf of Lorie Davis, filed. (Lancaster, Benjamin) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Lancaster on behalf of Lorie Davis, filed. (Lancaster, Benjamin) |
| Filing 12 Certified Mail Receipt Returned as to Attorney General of the State of Texas, executed on 8/16/18 re: 10 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (sanderson, 4) |
| ***Delivery Confirmation; delivery date Mon, Aug 13, 02:42 PM re: 9 Document(s) Sent, filed. (jdav, 4) |
| Filing 11 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 8/13/2018 re: 9 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (hler, 4) |
Filing 8
ORDER that the Clerks office shall serve the petition and a copy of this Order on the Respondent, Lorie Davis and on the office of the Attorney General of Texas. It is further ORDERED that the Respondent shall answer the petition or file a dispositive motion within ninety days of receipt of service; Answer due for Lorie Davis 11/10/2018. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
| Filing 7 Letter from Steve Parker re: request for copy of docket sheet, filed. Docket sheet mailed on Aug 9. (JenniferOlson, 4) |
| Filing 6 Petitioner's Notice to the Court to Proceed with his Habeas Case by Steve Vic Parker, filed. (nortiz, 5) Modified on 7/31/2018 (bgoolsby, 4). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Granting #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis as to Steve Vic Parker a/k/a Jerry Wilson . (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (drodriguez, 7) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Steve Vic Parker, filed. (drodriguez, 7) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Steve Vic Parker, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/17/2018. (drodriguez, 7) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Steve Vic Parker.(drodriguez, 7) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Parker v. Davis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Steve Vic Parker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Graham Lancaster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
