Chaudhary et al v. Chubb & Son, Inc. et al
| Younas Chaudhary and Bushra Chaudhary |
| Chubb & Son, Inc., Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and Chris Bettina |
| 4:2018cv02179 |
| June 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER entered: DENYING 90 MOTION to Exclude Opinions of Plaintiffs' Experts. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: AJG's motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 69), is denied in part and granted in part. The Chaudharys' claims against Bettina are dismissed. Their breach-of-fiduciary duty claims against AJG are dismissed. A status conference to put a scheduling order in place to resolve the remaining claims is set for August 12, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. by Zoom. A Zoom link will be sent to the parties. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: GRANTING 56 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, DENYING 55 MOTION to Remand, MOOTING 57 MOTION Motion to Clarify and/or Reurged Motion for Judgment. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered DENYING 8 MOTION to Remand. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
