Hicks v. Roll
| Courtney Lee Hicks |
| Randy Roll, Dionne S. Press, Allen C Isbell, Catherine Johnson and Eric Kugler |
| 4:2019cv01657 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in this Court's Memorandum and Opinion entered this date, this civil action is DISMISSED with prejudice....*** Case terminated on 6/11/19. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. The action filed by Courtney Lee Hicks (TDCJ-CID Inmate #02224565) lacks an arguable basis in law. His claims are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Any remaining pending motions are DENIED as moot. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) *** copy mailed to TDCJ Office of General Counsel and Inmate Trust Fund |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (mxperez, 5) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Randy Roll (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Courtney Lee Hicks.(mxperez, 5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
