Ross Dress for Less, Inc. v. ML Development LP
| 4:2020cv00978 |
| November 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered: Ross's motion for entry of final judgment, Docket Entry No. 73, and motion to vacate this court's award of attorneys' fees and costs to ML Development, Docket Entry No. 74, are granted. The court orders that ML Development pay Ross $546,929.20 in damages, plus pre- and post-judgment interest. Ross's motion to seal, Docket Entry No. 79, is denied. Ross's motion for attorneys' fees and costs, Docket Entry No. 72, is granted in part and denied in part. Ross is awarded $348,988.75 in attorneys' fees and $29,722.10 in costs. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered GRANTING 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment and DENYING 35 Cross Motion for Summary judgment. Final judgment to be entered by separate order. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ross Dress for Less, Inc. v. ML Development LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
