Peters v. The State Of Texas et al
Michael Geoffrey Peters |
Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson LLP, City Of Houston and The State Of Texas |
4:2020cv02044 |
June 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Sim Lake |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Letter from Michael G. Peters re: address for defendants, filed. (dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 5 Letter from Michael G. Peters re: Does Not Consent to Magistrate, filed. (dnoriega, 1) |
Initial Filing fee: $400.00 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number HOU096299, filed. (GloriaVasquez, 4) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL denying #2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Case terminated on 6/11/2020. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (BeverlyWright, 4) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Michael Geoffrey Peters, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/1/2020. (BeverlyWright, 4) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Michael Geoffrey Peters. #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (BeverlyWright, 4). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.