Ramirez v. Varughese et al
Daniel Ramirez |
Mariamma T. Varughese, Andrey Vasiljev and MD Co Hai Nguyen |
4:2021cv03922 |
November 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER TO ANSWER (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4) |
Confirmation of receipt of payment from TDCJ in the amount of $ 5.00 Receipt date: 1/20/2022. Receipt number HOU106751. Purpose Description: PLRA CIVIL FILING FEE. (GloriaVasquezadi, 4) |
Filing 7 Letter from Daniel Ramirez re: Proceed with lawsuit, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 6 Letter from plaintiff re: lawsuit and filing fee, filed. (rkonieczny, 4) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gclair, 4) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Daniel Ramirez, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Daniel Ramirez, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/20/2021. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Co Hai Nguyen, Mariamma T. Varughese, Andrey Vasiljev (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Daniel Ramirez.(BrandisIsom, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.