Kallinen v. Newman
| Randall Kallinen |
| Judge Michael Newman |
| 4:2022cv00652 |
| March 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
PROPOSED ORDER re: #12 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. , filed.(Hedge, Laura)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Dismiss #1 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Michael Newman, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hedge, Laura)
|
|
Filing 11
RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Michael Newman served on 3/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022, filed.(Kallinen, Randall)
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Randall Kallinen, filed.(Johnson, Alexander)
|
|
Filing 9
RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Michael Newman served on 3/14/2022, answer due 4/4/2022, filed.(Kallinen, Randall)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to Michael Newman. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(jdav, 4)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 5/25/2022 at 02:30 PM by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Reassignment. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. Judge David Hittner no longer assigned to the case. Parties notified, filed. (jdav, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
RECUSAL ORDER. Judge David Hittner recused. Deadlines in scheduling orders subsist. Court settings are vacated.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/2/2022 at 10:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
Request for Issuance of Summons as to Michael Newman, filed.(Johnson, Alexander)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Issuance of Summons as to Michael Newman, filed.(Johnson, Alexander)
|
|
Filing fee received 3/1/2022: $402.00, receipt number ATXSDC-27819868, filed. (knguyen, 4) .
|
|
Filing 1
ORIGINAL COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Randall Kallinen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Alexander) .
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kallinen v. Newman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Randall Kallinen | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Charles Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Judge Michael Newman | |
| Represented By: | Laura Beckman Hedge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
