Carder v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Katie Carder |
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC |
4:2022cv02367 |
July 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven J. Maguire on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, filed. (Maguire, Steven) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Withdraw Robert Christopher Bell as Attorney. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4) |
Filing 7 Agreed MOTION for Chris Bell to Withdraw as Attorney by Katie Carder, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Bell, Robert) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, filed.(Ramirez, John) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, filed.(Ramirez, John) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE IN A REMOVED ACTION by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Ramirez, John) |
The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/26/2022 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ltien, 4) |
Filing 2 Corrected APPENDIX by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, filed.(Ramirez, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 127th District Court, Harris County, case number 2022-32135 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28469279) filed by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Petition, #3 Exhibit Original Answer (State Court), #4 Exhibit Jury Demand (State Court))(Ramirez, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carder v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Katie Carder | |
Represented By: | Robert Christopher Bell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC | |
Represented By: | John A. Ramirez |
Represented By: | Steven James Maguire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.