Villarreal v. State Farm Lloyds
Plaintiff: Jose Armando Villarreal
Defendant: State Farm Lloyds
Case Number: 7:2015cv00292
Filed: June 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: McAllen Office
County: Starr
Presiding Judge: Micaela Alvarez
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 OPINION and ORDER re: 4 Opposed MOTION to Remand and for Attorneys Fees.(Signed by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(bgarces, 7)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Villarreal v. State Farm Lloyds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Lloyds
Represented By: Charles William Downing
Represented By: Sofia A Ramon
Represented By: Dan K Worthington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Armando Villarreal
Represented By: Joshua Paul Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?