The Ridge at Barton Creek v. Hunt
The Ridge at Barton Creek |
Brian Paul Hunt |
1:2013cv00175 |
March 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Austin Office |
Sam Sparks |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Brian Paul Hunt. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the District Court REMAND this case to the Travis County Court of Law No.1, Travis County, Texas. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (dm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: The Ridge at Barton Creek v. Hunt | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: The Ridge at Barton Creek | |
Represented By: | Warren Law Firm |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Brian Paul Hunt | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.