Nester et al v. Textron, Inc. et al
| Robert Scott Nester and Virginia Nester |
| Textron, Inc. and United Rentals, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv00920 |
| October 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
306
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 270 Motion for Reimbursement of Expert Expenses. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (ml)
|
|
Filing
161
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 103 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (ml)
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER DENYING 78 Motion to exclude Opinion Testimony of Dr. William Vigilante, Ph.D.; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 80 Motion to exclude the Opinions of Dr. David Bizzak; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 88 Motion to exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Herbert Newbold; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 91 Motion to exclude the Opinion Testimony of Dr. Lara McKenzie. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (ml)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 41 Motion to Compel; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 42 Motion for Protective Order to Vacate and for Attorney's Fees and Expenses; GRANTING 49 Alternative Motion to Compel designation of a proper Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (jk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
