Ketchum v. Informatica Corporation
Plaintiff: Debra Ketchum
Defendant: Informatica Corporation
Case Number: 1:2014cv00580
Filed: June 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: Austin Office
Presiding Judge: Sam Sparks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (jk)
December 26, 2014 Filing 24 Joint MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice by Informatica Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Temple, Mark)
December 22, 2014 Filing 23 ATTACHMENT Proposed Order to #21 MOTION to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines - Opposed by Debra Ketchum. (Dolezal, Trey)
December 22, 2014 Filing 22 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #21 MOTION to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines - Opposed. (jk)
December 22, 2014 Filing 21 MOTION to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines - Opposed by Debra Ketchum. (Dolezal, Trey)
December 19, 2014 Filing 20 MOTION for Protective Order by Informatica Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Temple, Mark)
December 19, 2014 Filing 19 MOTION for Protective Order by Informatica Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order)(Temple, Mark)
December 18, 2014 Filing 18 MOTION to Compel by Informatica Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Proposed Order)(Temple, Mark)
December 3, 2014 Filing 17 First AMENDED ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by Informatica Corporation. (jk)
December 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING #15 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (jk)
December 1, 2014 Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Answer by Informatica Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Temple, Mark)
August 25, 2014 Filing 14 NOTICE , Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge by Debra Ketchum (Dolezal, Trey)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: Consent to Trial by Magistrate due by 8/25/2014, Docket Call set for 2/26/2016 11:00 AM before Judge Sam Sparks, ADR Report Deadline due by 1/20/2015, Amended Pleadings due by 9/1/2014, Discovery due by 1/20/2015, Joinder of Parties due by 9/1/2014, Motions due by 2/20/2015. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (jk)
August 19, 2014 Filing 12 Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order by Informatica Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Scheduling Order)(Temple, Mark)
July 25, 2014 Filing 11 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by Informatica Corporation.(Temple, Mark)
July 11, 2014 Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT First against Informatica Corporation amending, filed by Debra Ketchum.(Dolezal, Trey)
July 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer ; Informatica Corporation answer due 7/14/2014. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (klw)
July 7, 2014 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Informatica Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Temple, Mark)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Informatica Corporation answer due 7/7/2014. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (jk)
June 27, 2014 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, by Informatica Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Temple, Mark)
June 26, 2014 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Informatica Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Temple, Mark)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order due by 8/19/2014. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (jk)
June 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (os)
June 20, 2014 Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Informatica Corporation. (Temple, Mark) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/20/2014: #1 Corrected Certificate of Service) (os).
June 20, 2014 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Informatica Corporation (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-6594450), filed by Informatica Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement)(Temple, Mark) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/20/2014: #4 Corrected Certificate of Service) (os).
June 20, 2014 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Debra Ketchum. (os)
June 20, 2014 Case Assigned to Judge Sam Sparks. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (os)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ketchum v. Informatica Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Debra Ketchum
Represented By: Trey L. Dolezal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Informatica Corporation
Represented By: Peter J. Stuhldreher
Represented By: Mark D. Temple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?