Cabello v. United States of America
| Archie Cabello |
| United States of America |
| 3:2021cv00242 |
| October 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Frank Montalvo |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MOTION to proceed In Forma Pauperis on appeal by Archie Cabello. (fm)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEAL by Archie Cabello. Per 5th Circuit rules, the appellant has 14 days, from the filing of the Notice of Appeal, to order the transcript. To order a transcript, the appellant should fill out a #(Transcript Order) and follow the instructions set out on the form. This form is available in the Clerk's Office or by clicking the hyperlink above. (jg1)
|
|
Filing 6
Certified Mail Receipt of #3 Memorandum Opinion and Order, #4 Final Judgment. (fm)
|
|
Filing 5
Certified Mailing of #3 Memorandum Opinion and Order,, #4 Final Judgment. (fm)
|
|
Filing 4
FINAL JUDGMENT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Archie Cabello. IT IS ORDERED that that Archie Cabellos pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Section 2241 Challenging the Validity of Conviction and Manner by which Sentence Was Executed (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent that Cabellos petition may be construed as a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 submitted without the approval of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, he is DENIED a CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.Signed by Judge Frank Montalvo. (fm)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Archie Cabello. IT IS ORDERED that that Cabellos pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Section 2241 Challenging the Validity of Conviction and Manner by which Sentence Was Executed (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent that Cabellos petition may be construed as a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 submitted without the approval of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, he is DENIED a CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Judge Frank Montalvo. (fm)
|
|
Filing 2
Filing fee received in the amount of $5, receipt number 300038365 (fm)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 300038365), filed by Archie Cabello. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(fm)
|
|
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Berton (fm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cabello v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Archie Cabello | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Mary F. Kruger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
