Aragones v. United States of America
Petitioner: Nelson Aragones
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2021cv00296
Filed: December 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Guaderrama
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Certified RETURN/RECD Mail Receipt of #7 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, (mg2)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Certified Mail Receipt of #7 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, (mg2)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DENYING #6 Motion to reconsider its order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241. IT IS ORDERED that Aragones' pro se "Objections to Court's Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice" (Doc. 6), which the Court construes as a motion to alter or amend a judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 9(e), is DENIED. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mg2)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Rule 59(e) motion Objection by Nelson Aragones. (mg2) Modified on 1/10/2022 (mg2). Modified on 1/11/2022 (mg2).
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Return signed Certified Mail Receipt of #2 Order,, #3 Order Dismissing Case to Nelson Aragones (mc4)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Certified Mail Receipt of #2 Order,, #3 Order Dismissing Case (mg2)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mg2)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the filing fee is WAIVED and Aragones is permitted to proceed in forma pauperis with his petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Aragones' "Motion for a Court Order to the Federal Bureau of Prisons to Take Custody of Petitioner" and "Motion to Request the Time Served at the West Texas Detention Facility to be Counted as Double" - which the Court construes as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241" (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the District Clerk shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mg2)
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28:2241 (No Application for IFP submitted and no filing fee submitted. ( Filing fee $ 0 receipt number xxx), filed by Nelson Aragones.(mg2)
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge SCHYDLOWER (mg2)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aragones v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nelson Aragones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Mary F. Kruger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?