Gibson v. Cardell Cabinetry LLC

Defendant: Cardell Cabinetry LLC
Plaintiff: Eric Dean Gibson
Movant: Fernando Rangel
Case Number: 5:2013cv00890
Filed: September 26, 2013
Court: Texas Western District Court
Office: San Antonio Office
Presiding Judge: Harry Lee Hudspeth
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 29:2102 WARN Act (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gibson v. Cardell Cabinetry LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cardell Cabinetry LLC
Represented By: Robert J. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Dean Gibson
Represented By: Robert I. Harwood
Represented By: Peter W. Overs, Jr.
Represented By: Reid Collins & Tsai, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: Fernando Rangel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.