Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The American Railway & Airway Supervisors' Association, et al
Plaintiff: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant: Roland Beltran and The American Railway & Airway Supervisors' Association
Counter Plaintiff: Roland Beltran and The American Railway & Airway Supervisors' Association
Counter Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 5:2017cv00270
Filed: March 31, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: San Antonio Office
Presiding Judge: Xavier Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 151 Railway Labor Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER DENYING 45 Motion to Amend Judgment. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (bc)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 39 Motion for Attorney Fees. Union Pacific is ORDERED to pay $110,252.25 in attorneys fees and $4,651.71 in costs and litigation expenses. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (bc)
January 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 21 Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Board's award is VACATED. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (aej)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The American Railway & Airway Supervisors' Association, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter plaintiff: Roland Beltran
Represented By: Rod Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter plaintiff: The American Railway & Airway Supervisors' Association
Represented By: Rod Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roland Beltran
Represented By: Rod Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The American Railway & Airway Supervisors' Association
Represented By: Rod Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Fred S. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Fred S. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?