Rylee Cark Eklund v. Lorie Davis
Petitioner: Rylee Carl Eklund
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Case Number: 5:2020cv00373
Filed: March 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2020 Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT Rylee Carl Eklund against Lorie Davis amending #1 Complaint., filed by Rylee Carl Eklund.(Hampton, Keith)
March 24, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Ex Parte Rylee Carl Eklund ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13380604). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Rylee Carl Eklund. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)(Hampton, Keith)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rylee Cark Eklund v. Lorie Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rylee Carl Eklund
Represented By: Keith S. Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?