Nathan Thompson Enterprises, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP
| Nathan Thompson Enterprises, Inc. |
| Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP |
| 5:2022cv00295 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Richard B Farrer |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING CERTAIN PRETRIAL MATTERS, ( Pretrial Conference set for 6/27/2022 10:00 AM before Judge Richard B. Farrer,). Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (nm)
|
|
Filing 7
COUNTERCLAIM against Nathan Thompson Enterprises, Inc., filed by Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP.(Husted, Clifford)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. It is this Court's policy to require all counsel to apply for admission to the Western District's federal bar and to follow through with the application as a condition of appearance pro hac vice in any case. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, if counsel appearing pro hac vice has not already done so, counsel shall promptly submit an application to be admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in the manner set forth in the Local Rules. The Court further ORDERS that counsel become familiar with the Local Court Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, a copy of which may be obtained from the United States District Clerk for the Western District of Texas or from the Court's website. If not already done, counsel appearing pro hac vice must immediately tender the amount of $100 to the Clerk of the Court, payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-1(f)(2). Finally, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel appearing pro hac vice, pursuant to Section 6 of the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal Cases in the Western District of Texas, must register as a filing user within ten (10) days of this Order. Entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (LR)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jarrett Richter ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 500060410) by Nathan Thompson Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Receipt). Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (nm)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP. (Husted, Clifford)
|
|
Filing 5
Certificate of Interested Parties by Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP. (Husted, Clifford)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (nm)
|
|
Filing 3
Pro Hac Vice Letter to Jarrett Richter. (nm)
|
|
Filing 2
Pro Hac Vice Letter to Ernesto Alvarez, Jr. (nm)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (nm)
|
|
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (nm)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15856441), filed by Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Supplement to JS44)(Hayes, Charles)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
