Parus Holdings Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
| Parus Holdings Inc. |
| Microsoft Corporation |
| 6:2021cv00570 |
| June 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order GRANTING #15 , #16 , and #17 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Before the Court are the Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motions, finds they should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry K. Shelton for Kirsten L. Elfstrand ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14997520) by on behalf of Microsoft Corporation. (Shelton, Barry)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry K. Shelton for Brianna L. Silverstein ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14997505) by on behalf of Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A)(Shelton, Barry)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry K. Shelton for Kirstin L. Stoll-DeBell ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14997479) by on behalf of Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A)(Shelton, Barry)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Alan D Albright.This Court, having considered Defendants Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time toFile Answer (the Motion), hereby GRANTS the Motion and ORDERS the following:Defendants deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended toAugust 12, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
|
|
Reset Deadlines: Microsoft Corporation answer due 8/12/2021. (ls)
|
|
Filing 14
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shelton, Barry)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Barry K. Shelton on behalf of Microsoft Corporation. Attorney Barry K. Shelton added to party Microsoft Corporation(pty:dft) (Shelton, Barry)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
|
|
Filing 12
Standing Order regarding Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright.
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Renaud on behalf of Parus Holdings Inc. (Renaud, Michael)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael J. McNamara on behalf of Parus Holdings Inc. (McNamara, Michael)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Andrea L. Fair on Behalf of Sean M. Casey ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14919957) by on behalf of Parus Holdings Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fair, Andrea)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parus Holdings Inc.. Microsoft Corporation served on 6/7/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Fair, Andrea)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to Microsoft Corporation. (bw)
|
|
Filing 6
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Parus Holdings Inc.. for Microsoft Corporation (Fair, Andrea)
|
|
Filing 5
RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Parus Holdings Inc.. (Fair, Andrea)
|
|
Filing 4
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Parus Holdings Inc.. (Fair, Andrea)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fair, Andrea)
|
|
Filing 2
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Parus Holdings Inc.. (Fair, Andrea)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14879148), filed by Parus Holdings Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Us Patent No. 6,721,705, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fair, Andrea)
|
|
All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing. All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
