H. Jay Spiegel & Associates, P.C. v. Spiegel
Plaintiff: H. Jay Spiegel & Associates, P.C.
Defendant: Steven M. Spiegel
Case Number: 1:2008cv00949
Filed: September 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Trademark Office
County: Fairfax
Presiding Judge: James C. Cacheris
Presiding Judge: Thomas Rawles Jones
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (See Memorandum Opinion For Details). Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 8/26/09. (nhall)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: H. Jay Spiegel & Associates, P.C. v. Spiegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: H. Jay Spiegel & Associates, P.C.
Represented By: H. Jay Spiegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven M. Spiegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?