Precision Franchising LLC v. B.W. Technical Training, Inc. et al
| Precision Franchising LLC |
| B.W. Technical Training, Inc. and William Mark Waters |
| 1:2009cv00059 |
| January 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Alexandria Office |
| Loudoun |
| John F. Anderson |
| Liam O'Grady |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. ORDERED that: (1) B.W. Technical Training, Inc. and William Mark Waters are enjoined from using any of Precision Franchising LLC's confidential manuals, software, or other proprietary materials; (2) B. W. Technical Training and William Mark Waters shall return to Precision Franchising LLC any of Precision Franchising LLC's confidential manuals, software, or other proprietary materials in their possession; (3) within fifteen (15) days, B.W. Tec hnical Training and William Mark Waters shall file with the court a statement indicating the steps taken to comply with the court's injunction; (4) Precision Franchising LLC is awarded a judgment against B.W. Technical Training, Inc. and William Mark Waters, jointly and severally, in the amount of $77,916.13, with interest accruing from the date of this judgment until paid. (See Order For Details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 6/22/09. (nhall)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
