Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Carmickle Thompson et al
Sentry Select Insurance Company |
Mary Carmickle Thompson, Donald Milligan, Randy Eugene Brown and Eagle Valley Trucking, Inc. |
1:2009cv00119 |
February 6, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Insurance Office |
Loudoun |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
Anthony J Trenga |
Defendant |
Diversity |
28:2201 Declaratory Judgment |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER -ORDERED that Plaintiff Sentry Select Insurance Company's Motion for SummaryJudgment (Doc. No. 46 ) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED and this Court hereby declares and finds that Plaintiff Sentry Select Insurance Company is not obligated by either insurance policy number CT739434-98093-051, issued by Plaintiff Sentry Select Insurance Company to Defendant Donald Milligan d/b/a C& T Trucking, or by the "Endorsement for Motor Carrier Policies of Insurance for Public L iability Under Sections 29 and 30 of the Motor Carrier Act of 1980" to pay any portion of the judgment entered on December 2, 2008 in Loudoun County Circuit Court against Defendant Eugene Brown or Defendant Eagle Valley Trucking; and it is furtherORDERED Defendant/Counter-Claimant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 49 ) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 10/19/2009. (kbro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.