Savage v. County of Stafford Virginia et al
Tony Edward Savage |
County of Stafford Virginia, County of Stafford Sheriff's Office, Charles E. Jett, C. P. Cameron, Ray Huston Davis, II and Larry Wayne Sturdivant, Jr. |
1:2009cv01328 |
November 27, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Alexandria Office |
Stafford |
John F. Anderson |
Liam O'Grady |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 128 MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: 100 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability as a Matter of Law and Damages Pursuant to 42 USC 1983 by Tony Edward Savage. 105 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by Larry Wayne Sturdivant, Jr.. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 11/16/2010. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff. (ktot, ) |
Filing 67 MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: 56 MOTION to Voluntarily Withdraw Eric Olsen and C.P. Cameron as Defendants Until Final Order Issued by Stafford County Circuit Court by Tony Edward Savage. 58 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint of Defendants Sturdi vant, Olsen and Cameron by C. P. Cameron, E. Olsen, Larry Wayne Sturdivant, Jr. 60 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint by County of Stafford Virginia. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 6/16/2010. Copy sent to pltf pro se. (stas) Modified on 6/18/2010 to add language regarding service on the pltf pro se. (stas). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.