TecSec, Incorporated v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
| TecSec, Incorporated |
| International Business Machines Corporation, SAS Institute, Inc., SAP America, Inc., SAP, AG, Cisco Systems, Inc., Sun Microsystems, Inc., Sybase, Inc., Software AG, Software AG, Inc., Adobe Sytems Incorporated, eBay, Inc., Paypal, Inc. and Oracle Corporation |
| 1:2010cv00115 |
| February 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Alexandria Office |
| Fairfax |
| Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
| Claude M. Hilton |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1375
MEMORANDUM OPINION- For good cause shown, the Court heard oral argument and granted the Dkt. 1340 Defendant's Adobe Inc's. Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Willful Infringement. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 3/14/2019. (See order for further details). (acha, ) Modified on 3/15/2019 to upload correct order (acha, ).
|
|
Filing
1157
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 1006 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 6/19/2018. (awac, )
|
|
Filing
959
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to the construction of the disputed claim terms in the '452 patent, the '702 patent, the '755 patent, and the '781 patent. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 12/21/2017. (awac, )
|
|
Filing
879
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Adobe Systems Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. No. 864), and Motion to Strike Portions of the Declaration of Mark Jones, (Dkt. No. 871). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 05/23/17. (pmil, )
|
|
Filing
772
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 05/07/15. (pmil, )
|
|
Filing
566
MEMORANDUM OPINION: In sum, after conducting extensive discovery, including subpoenaing a wide variety of IBM's customers to determine whether any of them ever used any of IBM's products in an infringing fashion, and gaining access to IBM&# 039;s source code, plaintiff has failed to uncover any actual evidence of direct infringement by IBM or any of its customers. Accordingly, summary judgment is appropriate in the defendant's favor on all infringement claims. For all these reasons , defendant IBM's Motion for its Proposed Claim Constructions and Summary Judgment of No Infringement [Dkt. No. 462] has been granted, plaintiff TecSec's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement by Defendant IBM and on Defendant& #039;s Affirmative Defenses of Release and Immunity under 28 U.S.C. § 1498 [Dkt. No. 478] has been denied, and summary judgment will now be entered in favor of defendant IBM by an Order to be issued with this Memorandum Opinion.Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 03/03/11. (yguy)
|
|
Filing
459
MEMORANDUM OPINION re parties cross-motions for summary judgment concerning the defendant's affirmative defenses of invalidity and inequitable conduct (Dkt. Nos. 392 and 399 ). Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 1/12/2011. (tche)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
