Gray v. Kelly

Petitioner: Ricky Jovan Gray
Respondent: Loretta K. Kelly
Case Number: 1:2011cv00630
Filed: June 13, 2011
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Sussex
Referring Judge: Theresa Carroll Buchanan
Presiding Judge: Anthony J Trenga
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 13, 2014 166 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 05/13/2014. (jlan)
April 27, 2012 68 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION re Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 4/27/2012. (klau, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gray v. Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ricky Jovan Gray
Represented By: Jonathan Paul Sheldon
Represented By: Robert Edward Lee, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Loretta K. Kelly
Represented By: Matthew P. Dullaghan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.