Sellerbid, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: Sellerbid, Inc.
Defendant: Groupon, Inc., Hungry Machine, Inc., Buywithme, Inc. and Opentable, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2011cv00768
Filed: July 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Arlington
Presiding Judge: Leonie M. Brinkema
Presiding Judge: Thomas Rawles Jones
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING Pro hac vice application of Thomas Christopher Cecil; Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 14683023062. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 7/25/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Receipt)(tche)
July 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING Pro hac vice application of Edward Reese Nelson, III; Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 14683023062. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 7/25/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Receipt)(tche)
July 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING Pro hac vice application of Christie Brow Lindsey; Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 14683023062. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 7/25/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Receipt)(tche)
July 21, 2011 Filing 4 Report on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent numbers 7,647,024 and 7,983,616. (pmil)
July 20, 2011 Filing 3 Summons Issued for service by SPS as to Buywithme, Inc., Groupon, Inc., Hungry Machine, Inc., Opentable, Inc. (pmil)
July 20, 2011 Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Sellerbid, Inc. (pmil)
July 20, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Buywithme, Inc., Groupon, Inc., Hungry Machine, Inc., Opentable, Inc. filed by Sellerbid, Inc. (Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 14683022991) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Receipt, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B)(pmil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sellerbid, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sellerbid, Inc.
Represented By: Craig Crandall Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Groupon, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hungry Machine, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buywithme, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Opentable, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?